dxa scan of the tibia Search Results


93
KUB Technologies Inc dual energy x ray absorptiometry dexa analyser
Improvement of bone health and body composition parameters in MyoAAV–C3/384‐treated homozygous DMSXL mice. A group of DMSXL male and female homozygous mice at age P5 received a systemic injection of MyoAAV vectors carrying Cas9 and sgC3/384 pair ( n = 7), and underwent whole‐body <t>DEXA</t> analysis at 16 weeks of age. Control animals were wild‐types (WT, n = 16) and untreated DMSXL homozygous mice (NT, n = 14) of both sexes. All data are represented as mean ± SEM and individual data points; data from male (open symbols) and female (filled symbols) mice are pooled. (A–C) Bone health parameters: bone mineral density (BMD) (A), bone mineral content (BMC) (B) and bone area (C). (A) BMD: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.595, df = 14, * p = .02. (B) BMC: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.371, df = 15, ** p = .004. (C) Bone area, WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 53, * p = .013; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 4.25, df = 16, *** p = .0006. (D–F) Body composition parameters: fat tissue percentage (D), lean tissue percentage (E) and fat/lean mass ratio (adiposity index, F). (D) Fat tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 46, ** p = .0052; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (E) Lean tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 45, ** p = .0045; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (F) Adiposity index, WT vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.265, df = 15.37, ** p = .0051; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.643, df = 16.41, * p = .017.
Dual Energy X Ray Absorptiometry Dexa Analyser, supplied by KUB Technologies Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dxa+scan+of+the+tibia/pmc11830570-163-15-30?v=KUB+Technologies+Inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dual energy x ray absorptiometry dexa analyser - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Siemens AG dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scanner syngo osteo ct
Improvement of bone health and body composition parameters in MyoAAV–C3/384‐treated homozygous DMSXL mice. A group of DMSXL male and female homozygous mice at age P5 received a systemic injection of MyoAAV vectors carrying Cas9 and sgC3/384 pair ( n = 7), and underwent whole‐body <t>DEXA</t> analysis at 16 weeks of age. Control animals were wild‐types (WT, n = 16) and untreated DMSXL homozygous mice (NT, n = 14) of both sexes. All data are represented as mean ± SEM and individual data points; data from male (open symbols) and female (filled symbols) mice are pooled. (A–C) Bone health parameters: bone mineral density (BMD) (A), bone mineral content (BMC) (B) and bone area (C). (A) BMD: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.595, df = 14, * p = .02. (B) BMC: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.371, df = 15, ** p = .004. (C) Bone area, WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 53, * p = .013; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 4.25, df = 16, *** p = .0006. (D–F) Body composition parameters: fat tissue percentage (D), lean tissue percentage (E) and fat/lean mass ratio (adiposity index, F). (D) Fat tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 46, ** p = .0052; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (E) Lean tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 45, ** p = .0045; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (F) Adiposity index, WT vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.265, df = 15.37, ** p = .0051; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.643, df = 16.41, * p = .017.
Dual Energy X Ray Absorptiometry Scanner Syngo Osteo Ct, supplied by Siemens AG, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dxa+scan+of+the+tibia/pmc11841467-49-12-20?v=Siemens+AG
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scanner syngo osteo ct - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Siemens AG syngo osteo ct
Improvement of bone health and body composition parameters in MyoAAV–C3/384‐treated homozygous DMSXL mice. A group of DMSXL male and female homozygous mice at age P5 received a systemic injection of MyoAAV vectors carrying Cas9 and sgC3/384 pair ( n = 7), and underwent whole‐body <t>DEXA</t> analysis at 16 weeks of age. Control animals were wild‐types (WT, n = 16) and untreated DMSXL homozygous mice (NT, n = 14) of both sexes. All data are represented as mean ± SEM and individual data points; data from male (open symbols) and female (filled symbols) mice are pooled. (A–C) Bone health parameters: bone mineral density (BMD) (A), bone mineral content (BMC) (B) and bone area (C). (A) BMD: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.595, df = 14, * p = .02. (B) BMC: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.371, df = 15, ** p = .004. (C) Bone area, WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 53, * p = .013; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 4.25, df = 16, *** p = .0006. (D–F) Body composition parameters: fat tissue percentage (D), lean tissue percentage (E) and fat/lean mass ratio (adiposity index, F). (D) Fat tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 46, ** p = .0052; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (E) Lean tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 45, ** p = .0045; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (F) Adiposity index, WT vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.265, df = 15.37, ** p = .0051; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.643, df = 16.41, * p = .017.
Syngo Osteo Ct, supplied by Siemens AG, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dxa+scan+of+the+tibia/pmc11603067-51-2-10?v=Siemens+AG
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
syngo osteo ct - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Loghman Pharmaceuticals dual energy x-ray absorptiometry
Improvement of bone health and body composition parameters in MyoAAV–C3/384‐treated homozygous DMSXL mice. A group of DMSXL male and female homozygous mice at age P5 received a systemic injection of MyoAAV vectors carrying Cas9 and sgC3/384 pair ( n = 7), and underwent whole‐body <t>DEXA</t> analysis at 16 weeks of age. Control animals were wild‐types (WT, n = 16) and untreated DMSXL homozygous mice (NT, n = 14) of both sexes. All data are represented as mean ± SEM and individual data points; data from male (open symbols) and female (filled symbols) mice are pooled. (A–C) Bone health parameters: bone mineral density (BMD) (A), bone mineral content (BMC) (B) and bone area (C). (A) BMD: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.595, df = 14, * p = .02. (B) BMC: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.371, df = 15, ** p = .004. (C) Bone area, WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 53, * p = .013; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 4.25, df = 16, *** p = .0006. (D–F) Body composition parameters: fat tissue percentage (D), lean tissue percentage (E) and fat/lean mass ratio (adiposity index, F). (D) Fat tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 46, ** p = .0052; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (E) Lean tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 45, ** p = .0045; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (F) Adiposity index, WT vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.265, df = 15.37, ** p = .0051; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.643, df = 16.41, * p = .017.
Dual Energy X Ray Absorptiometry, supplied by Loghman Pharmaceuticals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dxa+scan+of+the+tibia/pmc03660027-45-21-10?v=Loghman+Pharmaceuticals
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dual energy x-ray absorptiometry - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
CooperSurgical dual-emission x-ray absorptiometry dxa norland xr-800
Improvement of bone health and body composition parameters in MyoAAV–C3/384‐treated homozygous DMSXL mice. A group of DMSXL male and female homozygous mice at age P5 received a systemic injection of MyoAAV vectors carrying Cas9 and sgC3/384 pair ( n = 7), and underwent whole‐body <t>DEXA</t> analysis at 16 weeks of age. Control animals were wild‐types (WT, n = 16) and untreated DMSXL homozygous mice (NT, n = 14) of both sexes. All data are represented as mean ± SEM and individual data points; data from male (open symbols) and female (filled symbols) mice are pooled. (A–C) Bone health parameters: bone mineral density (BMD) (A), bone mineral content (BMC) (B) and bone area (C). (A) BMD: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.595, df = 14, * p = .02. (B) BMC: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.371, df = 15, ** p = .004. (C) Bone area, WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 53, * p = .013; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 4.25, df = 16, *** p = .0006. (D–F) Body composition parameters: fat tissue percentage (D), lean tissue percentage (E) and fat/lean mass ratio (adiposity index, F). (D) Fat tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 46, ** p = .0052; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (E) Lean tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 45, ** p = .0045; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (F) Adiposity index, WT vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.265, df = 15.37, ** p = .0051; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.643, df = 16.41, * p = .017.
Dual Emission X Ray Absorptiometry Dxa Norland Xr 800, supplied by CooperSurgical, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dxa+scan+of+the+tibia/pmc03468125-66-10-16?v=CooperSurgical
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dual-emission x-ray absorptiometry dxa norland xr-800 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OSTEOSYS CO LTD dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry
Improvement of bone health and body composition parameters in MyoAAV–C3/384‐treated homozygous DMSXL mice. A group of DMSXL male and female homozygous mice at age P5 received a systemic injection of MyoAAV vectors carrying Cas9 and sgC3/384 pair ( n = 7), and underwent whole‐body <t>DEXA</t> analysis at 16 weeks of age. Control animals were wild‐types (WT, n = 16) and untreated DMSXL homozygous mice (NT, n = 14) of both sexes. All data are represented as mean ± SEM and individual data points; data from male (open symbols) and female (filled symbols) mice are pooled. (A–C) Bone health parameters: bone mineral density (BMD) (A), bone mineral content (BMC) (B) and bone area (C). (A) BMD: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.595, df = 14, * p = .02. (B) BMC: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.371, df = 15, ** p = .004. (C) Bone area, WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 53, * p = .013; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 4.25, df = 16, *** p = .0006. (D–F) Body composition parameters: fat tissue percentage (D), lean tissue percentage (E) and fat/lean mass ratio (adiposity index, F). (D) Fat tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 46, ** p = .0052; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (E) Lean tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 45, ** p = .0045; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (F) Adiposity index, WT vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.265, df = 15.37, ** p = .0051; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.643, df = 16.41, * p = .017.
Dual Energy X Ray Absorptiometry, supplied by OSTEOSYS CO LTD, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dxa+scan+of+the+tibia/pmc07603128-101-9-12?v=OSTEOSYS+CO+LTD
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Qdr Inc dual x-ray absorptiometry (dxa) scan hologic qdr
Improvement of bone health and body composition parameters in MyoAAV–C3/384‐treated homozygous DMSXL mice. A group of DMSXL male and female homozygous mice at age P5 received a systemic injection of MyoAAV vectors carrying Cas9 and sgC3/384 pair ( n = 7), and underwent whole‐body <t>DEXA</t> analysis at 16 weeks of age. Control animals were wild‐types (WT, n = 16) and untreated DMSXL homozygous mice (NT, n = 14) of both sexes. All data are represented as mean ± SEM and individual data points; data from male (open symbols) and female (filled symbols) mice are pooled. (A–C) Bone health parameters: bone mineral density (BMD) (A), bone mineral content (BMC) (B) and bone area (C). (A) BMD: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.595, df = 14, * p = .02. (B) BMC: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.371, df = 15, ** p = .004. (C) Bone area, WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 53, * p = .013; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 4.25, df = 16, *** p = .0006. (D–F) Body composition parameters: fat tissue percentage (D), lean tissue percentage (E) and fat/lean mass ratio (adiposity index, F). (D) Fat tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 46, ** p = .0052; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (E) Lean tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 45, ** p = .0045; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (F) Adiposity index, WT vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.265, df = 15.37, ** p = .0051; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.643, df = 16.41, * p = .017.
Dual X Ray Absorptiometry (Dxa) Scan Hologic Qdr, supplied by Qdr Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dxa+scan+of+the+tibia/pmc05770658-135-8-14?v=Qdr+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dual x-ray absorptiometry (dxa) scan hologic qdr - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Faxitron Bioptics ex vivo dual energy x ray absorptiometry dexa
Small animal [ 89 Zr]-DFO-daratumumab confirms absence of hCD38 expression in vivo in MM.1S WT cells. (A) Cell binding of [ 89 Zr]-DFO-daratumumab to a murine MM cell line with hCD38 expression knocked in (5TGM1-hCD38-KI cells). (B) Representative 30-minute static PET/CT scans of MM.1S WT and MM.1S CD38 KO tumor bearing mice at 3 and 6 days after injection of [ 89 Zr]-DFO-daratumumab. Areas of high tracer uptake in the bones are indicated by white arrows. (C) Comparative quantification of SUV max between WT and CD38 KO tumor bearing mice at 6 days post-injection of [ 89 Zr]-DFO-daratumumab (2-way ANOVA; ns P > .05; ∗∗∗∗ P < .001). (D) Comparative quantification of the tissue density (Hounsfield units, HU) from in vivo CT across corresponding bone ROIs in MM.1S WT and MM.1S CD38 KO tumor bearing mice (2-way ANOVA; ns P > .05; ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗ P < .005; ∗∗∗∗ P < .001). (E) Comparative quantification of the BMD (milligram per square centimeter) of each bone ROI using <t>DEXA</t> imaging between MM.1S WT and MM.1S CD38 KO tumor bearing mice (2-way ANOVA; ns P > .05; ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗∗ P < .001). (F) <t>Planar</t> <t>X-ray</t> images of the femur and tibia from mice implanted with WT and CD38 KO MM cells reveal potential osteolytic lesions of the cortical and trabecular bone, marked by white arrows, indicating areas of bone degradation.
Ex Vivo Dual Energy X Ray Absorptiometry Dexa, supplied by Faxitron Bioptics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dxa+scan+of+the+tibia/pmc12828765-45-0-10?v=Faxitron+Bioptics
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ex vivo dual energy x ray absorptiometry dexa - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Hologic Inc dual energy x ray absorptiometry
Small animal [ 89 Zr]-DFO-daratumumab confirms absence of hCD38 expression in vivo in MM.1S WT cells. (A) Cell binding of [ 89 Zr]-DFO-daratumumab to a murine MM cell line with hCD38 expression knocked in (5TGM1-hCD38-KI cells). (B) Representative 30-minute static PET/CT scans of MM.1S WT and MM.1S CD38 KO tumor bearing mice at 3 and 6 days after injection of [ 89 Zr]-DFO-daratumumab. Areas of high tracer uptake in the bones are indicated by white arrows. (C) Comparative quantification of SUV max between WT and CD38 KO tumor bearing mice at 6 days post-injection of [ 89 Zr]-DFO-daratumumab (2-way ANOVA; ns P > .05; ∗∗∗∗ P < .001). (D) Comparative quantification of the tissue density (Hounsfield units, HU) from in vivo CT across corresponding bone ROIs in MM.1S WT and MM.1S CD38 KO tumor bearing mice (2-way ANOVA; ns P > .05; ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗ P < .005; ∗∗∗∗ P < .001). (E) Comparative quantification of the BMD (milligram per square centimeter) of each bone ROI using <t>DEXA</t> imaging between MM.1S WT and MM.1S CD38 KO tumor bearing mice (2-way ANOVA; ns P > .05; ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗∗ P < .001). (F) <t>Planar</t> <t>X-ray</t> images of the femur and tibia from mice implanted with WT and CD38 KO MM cells reveal potential osteolytic lesions of the cortical and trabecular bone, marked by white arrows, indicating areas of bone degradation.
Dual Energy X Ray Absorptiometry, supplied by Hologic Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dxa+scan+of+the+tibia/pmc12696650-55-14-22?v=Hologic+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dual energy x ray absorptiometry - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ALOKA Co Ltd dexa dcs-600 ex-iii
Small animal [ 89 Zr]-DFO-daratumumab confirms absence of hCD38 expression in vivo in MM.1S WT cells. (A) Cell binding of [ 89 Zr]-DFO-daratumumab to a murine MM cell line with hCD38 expression knocked in (5TGM1-hCD38-KI cells). (B) Representative 30-minute static PET/CT scans of MM.1S WT and MM.1S CD38 KO tumor bearing mice at 3 and 6 days after injection of [ 89 Zr]-DFO-daratumumab. Areas of high tracer uptake in the bones are indicated by white arrows. (C) Comparative quantification of SUV max between WT and CD38 KO tumor bearing mice at 6 days post-injection of [ 89 Zr]-DFO-daratumumab (2-way ANOVA; ns P > .05; ∗∗∗∗ P < .001). (D) Comparative quantification of the tissue density (Hounsfield units, HU) from in vivo CT across corresponding bone ROIs in MM.1S WT and MM.1S CD38 KO tumor bearing mice (2-way ANOVA; ns P > .05; ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗ P < .005; ∗∗∗∗ P < .001). (E) Comparative quantification of the BMD (milligram per square centimeter) of each bone ROI using <t>DEXA</t> imaging between MM.1S WT and MM.1S CD38 KO tumor bearing mice (2-way ANOVA; ns P > .05; ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗∗ P < .001). (F) <t>Planar</t> <t>X-ray</t> images of the femur and tibia from mice implanted with WT and CD38 KO MM cells reveal potential osteolytic lesions of the cortical and trabecular bone, marked by white arrows, indicating areas of bone degradation.
Dexa Dcs 600 Ex Iii, supplied by ALOKA Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dxa+scan+of+the+tibia/pm33952822-57-7-14?v=ALOKA+Co+Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dexa dcs-600 ex-iii - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Alphamed INC dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry dxa
Small animal [ 89 Zr]-DFO-daratumumab confirms absence of hCD38 expression in vivo in MM.1S WT cells. (A) Cell binding of [ 89 Zr]-DFO-daratumumab to a murine MM cell line with hCD38 expression knocked in (5TGM1-hCD38-KI cells). (B) Representative 30-minute static PET/CT scans of MM.1S WT and MM.1S CD38 KO tumor bearing mice at 3 and 6 days after injection of [ 89 Zr]-DFO-daratumumab. Areas of high tracer uptake in the bones are indicated by white arrows. (C) Comparative quantification of SUV max between WT and CD38 KO tumor bearing mice at 6 days post-injection of [ 89 Zr]-DFO-daratumumab (2-way ANOVA; ns P > .05; ∗∗∗∗ P < .001). (D) Comparative quantification of the tissue density (Hounsfield units, HU) from in vivo CT across corresponding bone ROIs in MM.1S WT and MM.1S CD38 KO tumor bearing mice (2-way ANOVA; ns P > .05; ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗ P < .005; ∗∗∗∗ P < .001). (E) Comparative quantification of the BMD (milligram per square centimeter) of each bone ROI using <t>DEXA</t> imaging between MM.1S WT and MM.1S CD38 KO tumor bearing mice (2-way ANOVA; ns P > .05; ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗∗ P < .001). (F) <t>Planar</t> <t>X-ray</t> images of the femur and tibia from mice implanted with WT and CD38 KO MM cells reveal potential osteolytic lesions of the cortical and trabecular bone, marked by white arrows, indicating areas of bone degradation.
Dual Energy X Ray Absorptiometry Dxa, supplied by Alphamed INC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dxa+scan+of+the+tibia/pm28653440-164-50-22?v=Alphamed+INC
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry dxa - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Vertec Scientific Limited duel-energy x-ray absorptiometry (dexa) scan hologic discovery
Small animal [ 89 Zr]-DFO-daratumumab confirms absence of hCD38 expression in vivo in MM.1S WT cells. (A) Cell binding of [ 89 Zr]-DFO-daratumumab to a murine MM cell line with hCD38 expression knocked in (5TGM1-hCD38-KI cells). (B) Representative 30-minute static PET/CT scans of MM.1S WT and MM.1S CD38 KO tumor bearing mice at 3 and 6 days after injection of [ 89 Zr]-DFO-daratumumab. Areas of high tracer uptake in the bones are indicated by white arrows. (C) Comparative quantification of SUV max between WT and CD38 KO tumor bearing mice at 6 days post-injection of [ 89 Zr]-DFO-daratumumab (2-way ANOVA; ns P > .05; ∗∗∗∗ P < .001). (D) Comparative quantification of the tissue density (Hounsfield units, HU) from in vivo CT across corresponding bone ROIs in MM.1S WT and MM.1S CD38 KO tumor bearing mice (2-way ANOVA; ns P > .05; ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗ P < .005; ∗∗∗∗ P < .001). (E) Comparative quantification of the BMD (milligram per square centimeter) of each bone ROI using <t>DEXA</t> imaging between MM.1S WT and MM.1S CD38 KO tumor bearing mice (2-way ANOVA; ns P > .05; ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗∗ P < .001). (F) <t>Planar</t> <t>X-ray</t> images of the femur and tibia from mice implanted with WT and CD38 KO MM cells reveal potential osteolytic lesions of the cortical and trabecular bone, marked by white arrows, indicating areas of bone degradation.
Duel Energy X Ray Absorptiometry (Dexa) Scan Hologic Discovery, supplied by Vertec Scientific Limited, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dxa+scan+of+the+tibia/pm30079026-115-1-8?v=Vertec+Scientific+Limited
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
duel-energy x-ray absorptiometry (dexa) scan hologic discovery - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Improvement of bone health and body composition parameters in MyoAAV–C3/384‐treated homozygous DMSXL mice. A group of DMSXL male and female homozygous mice at age P5 received a systemic injection of MyoAAV vectors carrying Cas9 and sgC3/384 pair ( n = 7), and underwent whole‐body DEXA analysis at 16 weeks of age. Control animals were wild‐types (WT, n = 16) and untreated DMSXL homozygous mice (NT, n = 14) of both sexes. All data are represented as mean ± SEM and individual data points; data from male (open symbols) and female (filled symbols) mice are pooled. (A–C) Bone health parameters: bone mineral density (BMD) (A), bone mineral content (BMC) (B) and bone area (C). (A) BMD: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.595, df = 14, * p = .02. (B) BMC: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.371, df = 15, ** p = .004. (C) Bone area, WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 53, * p = .013; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 4.25, df = 16, *** p = .0006. (D–F) Body composition parameters: fat tissue percentage (D), lean tissue percentage (E) and fat/lean mass ratio (adiposity index, F). (D) Fat tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 46, ** p = .0052; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (E) Lean tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 45, ** p = .0045; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (F) Adiposity index, WT vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.265, df = 15.37, ** p = .0051; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.643, df = 16.41, * p = .017.

Journal: Clinical and Translational Medicine

Article Title: Muscle‐specific gene editing improves molecular and phenotypic defects in a mouse model of myotonic dystrophy type 1

doi: 10.1002/ctm2.70227

Figure Lengend Snippet: Improvement of bone health and body composition parameters in MyoAAV–C3/384‐treated homozygous DMSXL mice. A group of DMSXL male and female homozygous mice at age P5 received a systemic injection of MyoAAV vectors carrying Cas9 and sgC3/384 pair ( n = 7), and underwent whole‐body DEXA analysis at 16 weeks of age. Control animals were wild‐types (WT, n = 16) and untreated DMSXL homozygous mice (NT, n = 14) of both sexes. All data are represented as mean ± SEM and individual data points; data from male (open symbols) and female (filled symbols) mice are pooled. (A–C) Bone health parameters: bone mineral density (BMD) (A), bone mineral content (BMC) (B) and bone area (C). (A) BMD: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.595, df = 14, * p = .02. (B) BMC: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.371, df = 15, ** p = .004. (C) Bone area, WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 53, * p = .013; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 4.25, df = 16, *** p = .0006. (D–F) Body composition parameters: fat tissue percentage (D), lean tissue percentage (E) and fat/lean mass ratio (adiposity index, F). (D) Fat tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 46, ** p = .0052; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (E) Lean tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 45, ** p = .0045; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (F) Adiposity index, WT vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.265, df = 15.37, ** p = .0051; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.643, df = 16.41, * p = .017.

Article Snippet: Bone health and body composition were comprehensively evaluated at the age of 4 months using Dual Energy X‐ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) analyser (The PARAMETER™ XPERT® 40 Cabinet X‐ray System, T00261_A 9.2019; Kubtec Scientific, 111 Research Drive Stratford, CT 06615, USA).

Techniques: Injection, Control, MANN-WHITNEY

Small animal [ 89 Zr]-DFO-daratumumab confirms absence of hCD38 expression in vivo in MM.1S WT cells. (A) Cell binding of [ 89 Zr]-DFO-daratumumab to a murine MM cell line with hCD38 expression knocked in (5TGM1-hCD38-KI cells). (B) Representative 30-minute static PET/CT scans of MM.1S WT and MM.1S CD38 KO tumor bearing mice at 3 and 6 days after injection of [ 89 Zr]-DFO-daratumumab. Areas of high tracer uptake in the bones are indicated by white arrows. (C) Comparative quantification of SUV max between WT and CD38 KO tumor bearing mice at 6 days post-injection of [ 89 Zr]-DFO-daratumumab (2-way ANOVA; ns P > .05; ∗∗∗∗ P < .001). (D) Comparative quantification of the tissue density (Hounsfield units, HU) from in vivo CT across corresponding bone ROIs in MM.1S WT and MM.1S CD38 KO tumor bearing mice (2-way ANOVA; ns P > .05; ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗ P < .005; ∗∗∗∗ P < .001). (E) Comparative quantification of the BMD (milligram per square centimeter) of each bone ROI using DEXA imaging between MM.1S WT and MM.1S CD38 KO tumor bearing mice (2-way ANOVA; ns P > .05; ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗∗ P < .001). (F) Planar X-ray images of the femur and tibia from mice implanted with WT and CD38 KO MM cells reveal potential osteolytic lesions of the cortical and trabecular bone, marked by white arrows, indicating areas of bone degradation.

Journal: Blood Advances

Article Title: Ablation of CD38 in multiple myeloma cells leads to an aggressive phenotype in a mouse xenograft model

doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2025017296

Figure Lengend Snippet: Small animal [ 89 Zr]-DFO-daratumumab confirms absence of hCD38 expression in vivo in MM.1S WT cells. (A) Cell binding of [ 89 Zr]-DFO-daratumumab to a murine MM cell line with hCD38 expression knocked in (5TGM1-hCD38-KI cells). (B) Representative 30-minute static PET/CT scans of MM.1S WT and MM.1S CD38 KO tumor bearing mice at 3 and 6 days after injection of [ 89 Zr]-DFO-daratumumab. Areas of high tracer uptake in the bones are indicated by white arrows. (C) Comparative quantification of SUV max between WT and CD38 KO tumor bearing mice at 6 days post-injection of [ 89 Zr]-DFO-daratumumab (2-way ANOVA; ns P > .05; ∗∗∗∗ P < .001). (D) Comparative quantification of the tissue density (Hounsfield units, HU) from in vivo CT across corresponding bone ROIs in MM.1S WT and MM.1S CD38 KO tumor bearing mice (2-way ANOVA; ns P > .05; ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗ P < .005; ∗∗∗∗ P < .001). (E) Comparative quantification of the BMD (milligram per square centimeter) of each bone ROI using DEXA imaging between MM.1S WT and MM.1S CD38 KO tumor bearing mice (2-way ANOVA; ns P > .05; ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗∗ P < .001). (F) Planar X-ray images of the femur and tibia from mice implanted with WT and CD38 KO MM cells reveal potential osteolytic lesions of the cortical and trabecular bone, marked by white arrows, indicating areas of bone degradation.

Article Snippet: Ex vivo dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) was performed using a Faxitron UltraFocus100 system.

Techniques: Expressing, In Vivo, Binding Assay, Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography, Injection, Imaging